Swaziland is a monarchial kingdom,the only one remaining in Africa. It is about the size of a dot when looked on the map and is economically depended on the Republic of South Africa. In economical evaluation, it is a developing country with a disappointing growth rate of 0.02 %. Swaziland is categorised as a lower-middle-income country. She is a member of the Southern African Development Community (SADC). She is also a member of the trading body known as the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and COMESA. Her main trading partners are South Africa, the United States and the European Union.
On the religious terrain, the mountanious kingdom boasts of about eighty-two point seven zero percent of Christians,making it the dominant religion. This is according to a report by the Religious Intelligence survey. Anglican, Protestant and Indegenous African churches, including African Zionist and Roman Catholics constitute the majority of the Christians in the country. Swazis are globally known as notoriously religious and in many instances take God for granted. In the last six or so years,Swaziland was designated the pulpit of Africa,either metaphorical or in the literal sense, only God knows. However,what one knows is that the pundits of the obtaining Tinkhundla oligarchy have taken this prophesy literal to intensify their hold on power.
The objective of this paper is an attempt at essaying the various empirical ways by which religion and leadership problem have impeded development in the Kingdom of eSwatini. It behooves me, therefore, to preface this discussion by giving an insight to what development refers to in this context. Development implies continous improvement/ progress toward a better,higher and more advanced stage. It simply denotes change though change itself does not necessarily implies development always. In evaluating areas of development,it is paramount to consider their impact on human life,for every development should be to the betterment of every individual in that nation. Therefore, development evaluation in this paper would tend to be based on the wider category of civil society-which in this context points to the establishment of institutions which maximises harmony, human's alienable rights, security and peace. Hypothetically, ,an ideal civil society renders every individual the opportunity to pursue happiness and self-determination that hinge on fulfillment.
For the above to manifest ithemselves in every society,all institutions and spheres of human activity should be optimised. However,this ideal will never be realised in a society where the bearer is constricted to think and act creatively . This ideal will also be threatened by lack of equal possibilities for all, due to sex, clan and any other distinguishing human characteristic which are still chronic challenges faced by sive semaSwati, especially nepotism based on clan name (bomusa wabani). It remains crystal clear that development as refered to here should be witnessed in the medical landscape, education, reduction of employment, especially among the youth, life expectancy, political and economic systems, science/technology and industries.
Swaziland is a very ambitious country working (hard) on being perched among the developed nations of the world. However,as things are within this kingdom,this ambition may as well remain like that; an ambition. There is no contented effort on the part of the government that shows Swaziland is serious about its vision 2022. The efforts are only in the talking. There are many factors that are seriously impeding national development within the Kingdom of eSwatini. Corruption, bad governance, recycling political leaders, nepotism, a non-people driven national budget and an extravagant and non-transparent royal emolument. However,it is not in the interest of this paper to elucidate on the above serious factors though reference may be made in passing or to emphasise a point.
Religion and a leadership problem remain two of the greatest bulwarks in as far as Swaziland's development is concerned. For Swaziland, prayer,fasting and offerings are considered important activities in dealing with all national ills. This is no exxageration. One only needs to look back to Swaziland's worse economic years two years ago when SACU reciepts were drastically reduced, which makes about sixty percent of Swaziland's national budget. Religious groups involving all churches led by the Swaziland Conference of Churches organised a mass prayer aimed at resuscitating the Kingdom's economy. The prayer was held at Swaziland's commercial hub, Manzini at the Mavuso Trade and Exhibition centre. Government officials, including the Prime Minister Dr SB Dlamini attended in their numbers. This economic case is not the only one. Swaziland has a high record of road accidents. Known roads prone to blood-curdling accidents include the Malagwane hill, eLangeni (both on the Mbabane-Manzini highway) , Hhelehhele on the outskirt of Manzini on your way to the Lowveld region, Mehlwabovu and the Nhlangano-Mahamba road. Many lives have been lost and the problem which cause such chilling accidents identified. But the Swazi government ignored this and happily hide under the quick reaction of churches that always organise a prayer.
In many political blunders and human rights disregard, the church has chosen to be mum. Except for the Swaziland Council of Churches which always condemn Swaziland's notoriety where human rights and bad governance is concerned. In 2012 ,Swaziland has to battle with one of the longest labour strikes organised by the Swaziland National Association of Teachers (SNAT). Among other things they were demanding other than pay rise was the firing of Swaziland's long-serving and bully PM, the incumbent and authoritarian Dr SB Dlamini. They were also demanding the transition of Swaziland into multi-party system of governance. While rightly justified in calling for these basic human necessities, some religious elements cropped up. SNAT administrators eventually organised a prayer. Prayer works, but where it does not, it fails dismally. The labour strike eventually lost vigour and disunit was the final nail on it.
Political ills and government maladministration can never be corrected nor worked out by prayer. What is needed is serious confrontation with the powers that be. As it is, this is unlikely to be the case for the reason that the king is also seen as a spiritual figure. Government resources are annually utilised to fund and make possible activities of the Christian religion which is widely practised. This is despite Swaziland's secular status as embodied in the kingdom's Constitution. As history has taught us, once the state and religion enjoy some sort of cordial mutuality, the populace suffers immeasurable. In the first instance,it is wrong for His Majesty's government to fund other religious sects and ignore some using taxpayers' money. That said, religion in Swaziland has cultivated the culture of complacency. Many Swazi Christians turn a blind eye to social ills and talk about the happiness that awaits them yonder this world! That God have stored for them a white robe.
The social responsibility of the church is not limited to preaching and taking offerings and tithes. Its far transcends that and include creating an enabling and conducive living space for its adherents. For one,there is nothing saint in living in a country where the taxpayers' money is used to fund the lavish lifestyle of a certain clique. There is nothing orthodoxically when politicians are offered pay rise and bought top-of-the range BMW vehicles in a country where the majority die of many diseases due to poor health systems. However,this deplorable behaviour by His Majesty's government has gone without any castigation from the church. Like earlier alluded here, prayer, fasting and offerings highlights both the spoken and unspoken assumptions of Swaziland's religious people-that they have final answers to life and great social challenges. Professor Don Cupitt once said that final answers have the impact of removing the need for progress. It is, therefore, in this sense that religion has impeded our development. For,religion has produced many Swazi people who live as though protesting government is not only wrong but even asking certain questions and making certain demands is wrong because governments are installed by God. Therefore, God's institutions are immune from demands, protests and criticism. Secondly, the church has created many people who look to divine revelation for guidance, therefore,they are constrained to invade the secular realm for answers. This kind of behaviour planted by the church has succesfully given rise to sentiments but sadly produced sterility as their doctrines give birth to freaks.
People who are notoriously religious tends to be relatively comfortable and cosy since religion, once again in Prof. Cupitt's words, ''produces potted answers to life's dilemmas'', and to greatest injustice too. Further, Dennis Nineham observed that religion impedes progress by its nature of constricting personal freedom. No plant grows well in a constricted space, the same cannot be overemphasised of the human species. As things stand, religion in Swaziland with its impositions is here to stay-not because it is the opium of the populace but because it is a winning tool of the Tinkhundla oligarchy. Again, because religion in its own right is a valid way of respecting and exploring the mysteries of life. It is also the greatest pacifier to many folks.
Moving on, one comes to the main issue; leadership problem. One must state on the outset that this area is so dangerous that one can be jailed. Swaziland lacks democratic principles and is not willing to embrace them. Even after losing AGOA, America's preferential trading treaty. Multi-partism is banned and political parties remain proscribed under the 2008 controversially Suppression and Terrorism Act. Dissidents and Mswati's critics are gaoled based on this act. It is this act jointly combined with unseen wielding powers (Labadzala) and Swaziland's disregard of international conventions and its own Constitution that has plunged it into the ungovernable position it is in. Politics in Swaziland are about egos.
Swaziland's political situation is detrimental to the stable foundations desired by foreign investors. The king is reportedly demanding at least ten percent shares in every investor who want to set up business in the kingdom. This is what waters down the kingdom's effort to rise to greater heights economically. As one write, the king owns ten percent shares from Swazi MTN- a mobile communication that enjoys a politically protected monopoly. He also owns about forty percent shares at the Royal Swaziland Sugar Company. He is reportedly co-owning Salgaocar Swaziland-a mining conglomerate that set up business in Swaziland under unclear circumstances. This is quite different from royal token. This combined with other important factors such as high call rates, business monopoly in important sectors such as communication, and government's involvement in businesses do not auger well for the nation's business environment. Swaziland, therefore needs to improve her business environment through sound and meaningful reforms. The 2013 Ibrahim Index of Governance, for instance ranked Swaziland poorly in participation of human rights, as well as sustainable economic opportunity attributed to weak institutional capacity and a relatively rigid political system.
The nation's political system which when it was introduced by the late king Sobhuza ii was nothing but an experiment strives on secrecy. There is lack of transparency in the use of government's money. Swaziland's spending priorities are in conflict with capacitating the citizenry through creating employment and empowering its youth to venture into business. The army takes a budget of nearly a billion while the health and education sectors are finding it hard to survive. This in a nation that has prioritised health and education. DNA Economics consultant Frank Flatters accused, rightly so, Swaziland's misuse of funds recieved from SACU. He said that the government budget is bloated through high wages . He forgot to add, ''politician and committee wages''.
These paper has given an account of how religion and leadership problem jointly impede national progress in Swaziland. The author believes Swaziland can achieve more if the secular world can be painstakingly invaded for solutions engulfing the kingdom than looking for divine guidance. Further, a people driven political system can help a long way in being a panacea to Swaziland's political ills that are grossly hindering development . Divine revealed systems such as the ''God-given Monarchial democracy'' are letting down Swaziland's capability to soar.
Khayelihle Simelane is a BA holder in Humanities obtained at the University of Swaziland. He majored in History and Theology and Religious Studies. He is also a former contributing writer at the Times of Swaziland newspapers, an independent paper.